Now, even if it were true, why would the Library of Congress bother to inform Weldon of this? Isn't that a bit odd?
"The Library of Congress has informed Weldon that 2 terabites of material equals approximately 1/4 of all the material in the Library of Congress."
Now, even if it were true, why would the Library of Congress bother to inform Weldon of this? Isn't that a bit odd?<<
I reread the article. Weldon said it himself, he probably has a technological problem with apple and orange comparisons and ALL politicians overstate their case, with the exception of Chris Shays.
He talks and everyone falls asleep.
DK
Now, even if it were true, why would the Library of Congress bother to inform Weldon of this? Isn't that a bit odd?"
It is not a bit odd. Since Weldon is a member of CONGRESS, the Library of CONGRESS might well answer an enquiry about how this amount of data compares to the LOC's holdings. The will often answer enquiries for academics. I would imagine that if you are a Member of Congress, they will let you pick their brains for a half hour or more, and will even issue written replies to enquiries.
Would it be "odd" for a law librarian at a large law firm to provide information to a partner in that law firm? No. Well, this is no different.