[finnigan2]

" She is far from poor , she is young, but her actions in a porn film disqualify her from being called a lady IMHO."

- I happened to see the porn film in question before it got pulled off the web site. It was unremarkable (as porn films go) except for the striking way in which Ms. Hilton was playing to the camera, rather than her lover, throughout. She was supposedly giving him the big Lewinsky but kept twisting around to try and leer at the camera. In short, she was about as involved in the action as any street hardened hooker would be.
The fact that she has since gone on, unfazed, to keep herself in the public eye tells me that she is, despite her money and social standing, just a cheap scrag.

[sgtbono2002]

I too saw the film. On a scale of 1 to 9 I give it a 2. Her performance put most who saw it to sleep. When it comes to being hot--she is not.