Judicial fealty?
The question is, and tell me in plain, non-ambulance-chaser language...
Is he going to rule, eventually, that the 2nd Amendment, means what it says, is an INDIVIDUAL right, and is, as the amendment PLAINLY states - NOT to be infringed.
If we ever lose this right, the rest are sure to follow (but of course, not without a lot of freedom-robbing gun-grabbers dying).
By the way, does anyone know if gun-grabbing media-whore, Chuckie Schumer, or any other Senator (i.e., Feinswein), asked Judge Robert any questions related to the 2nd Amendment?
"...does anyone know if gun-grabbing media-whore, Chuckie Schumer, or any other Senator (i.e., Feinswein), asked Judge Robert any questions related to the 2nd Amendment?"
I heard several hours of the hearings but certainly not all. I did not ever hear any mention of the 2d Amendment or gun control. I suspect that if it had been brought up, Mr. Roberts would have declined to take a position since it could come before the court in the future.