A remarkably stupid idea.
Hamlet's tragic flaw--which is not actually hesitation, but presumption, the desire to damn Claudius, to which he as a mere man has no right, rather than just kill him, to which as an heir whose throne was usurped he has every right--makes not sense in an Islamic context, where deliberately damning (according to their lights) apostates, 'infidels' and the like is perfectly acceptable.
Depends on what you mean by "usurped." In the sense that Claudius murdered his Brother it was an usurpation, but his actual election as king would not have been an usurpation by the Danish system. cf Harold Jenkins.