Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner

I expect it to be over 40 against on the basis that Judge Roberts declined to answer too many questions, and that the Dims will filibuster. Otherwise, it will weaken any argument they may have to invoke the "extraordinary circumstances" exception and filibuster President Bush's next nominee. But then again, when has a weak argument stopped the Dims?


799 posted on 09/15/2005 9:14:00 AM PDT by rwa265 (I was blind, now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies ]


To: rwa265

I'd love to see them try and filibuster this, but I don't think it's gonna happen.


808 posted on 09/15/2005 9:17:42 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265; OXENinFLA

Do you guys really think the Dems are gonna filibuster?

I wouldn't put it past them, but anyone watching these hearings would have to conclude that Roberts is undeniably qualified and has given no hint to being right-leaning. If they do, they will look ridiculous. Of course, that's not a bad thing.


821 posted on 09/15/2005 9:23:07 AM PDT by conservativebabe (September 11, 2001 - NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson