The LM article basically claimed that the camps were merely temporary holding places where refugees could come and go as they wished.
This lost the libel trial because that claim was rubbish.
There has never been any question in my opinion or in the article that I published that this camp was anything other than a grim place at which there were beatings, there were killings and there were rapes. There has never been any question of that. We have never argued contrary to that. - Michael Hume
I do not say that they at the time were able to leave and there - you know, there were fences, there were guards, which we have seen here, armed guards. - Thomas Deichmann
In other words, the only people who still think Trnopolje was no big deal are the Marxists and Serbs with very selective listening skills.
>>> This lost the libel trial because that claim was rubbish.<<<
Penny Marshall won the libel case becase LM HURT HER FEELINGS, not because of factual error or false claims ("was rubbish" as you say.)
Under British libel law, you may say the truth and lose the libel case, as demonstrated in Liberace case.
Liberace lied without blinking under oath that he is not a homosexual and won the libel case aganist british tabloid.
he would be thrown out of any American court.
The case of Penny Marshall (i.e her bosses in MI6/ITN) is no different. Mendacious litigation that worked.
What followed, the explloitation of stills from Penny Marshall fake video is the best orchestrated holocaust revisionist ploy since "Hitler diaries". Sadly, no Jewish organisatin came forward to protest the abuse of memory of 6 million who perished in The Holocaust.
Belsen was not a fake story. Penny Marshall's was and they were blended together.