Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.A. Cunningham
The article I linked to said the hose-and-drogue systems could not pump fuel fast enough for a bomber. Even the flying boom takes 20 minutes to fill a B-52, and the hoses supply a quarter or less of the flow per second of the boom.

The B-1 sure is a pretty aircraft, by the way. I don't think it lived up to its billing, however.

-ccm

78 posted on 09/15/2005 9:26:51 AM PDT by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: ccmay; A.A. Cunningham
The article I linked to said the hose-and-drogue systems could not pump fuel fast enough for a bomber. Even the flying boom takes 20 minutes to fill a B-52, and the hoses supply a quarter or less of the flow per second of the boom.

Not really. The Flight Refuelling Mk32 pod (most common fit)is limited to 400 US gal/min (almost half, not a quarter of a boom rate).
But the big fuselage fitted Flight Refuelling Limited’s Mk 17 Hose Drum Unit )fitted to RAF VC=10, L1011, and the Airbus MRTT) manages about 800 US gal/min - which is near boom rates

81 posted on 09/15/2005 10:37:55 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Seriousness lends force to bad arguments. - P J O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson