The Judiciary Strikes Back
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: HHKrepublican
The liberal judge evidently thinks that it's an "undue burden" for the females not to be able to suck out the brains of a 9 month old baby, collapse its skull, and pull it from the womb.
The liberal nazi would have done well working for Mengele.
To: HHKrepublican
It's time to start punishing judges..... harshly.
To: HHKrepublican
4 posted on
09/14/2005 6:26:40 PM PDT by
SteveMcKing
("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
To: HHKrepublican
Then why did we even bother to vote on this? It won quite handily & there were certainly enough signatures to put it on the ballot.
Judges are the scourge of the earth! Bottom-feeders.What ever happened to the "will of the people?" ARRRGGHH!
6 posted on
09/14/2005 6:27:59 PM PDT by
madison10
To: HHKrepublican
Welcome to FR.
The Necrocrats strike again. The bright side is their population is shrinking.
7 posted on
09/14/2005 6:28:41 PM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
To: HHKrepublican
Wouldn't it be fun to take these "judges," cut a hole in the back of their head and suck their brains out. Whoops! We're talking about a "judge" here. No brains. Nevermind.
9 posted on
09/14/2005 6:30:03 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(We Gave Peace A Chance. It Didn't Work Out. Search keyword: 09-11-01.)
To: HHKrepublican
Is comparing these libs to Nazi's unfair to Nazi's?
10 posted on
09/14/2005 6:30:17 PM PDT by
lormand
(George W. Bush is saving your ass, whether you like it or not.)
To: HHKrepublican
The state Legislature approved a new law attempting to ban the procedure in June 2004. Hundreds of thousands of voters signed petitions that allowed the bill to become law with only the approval of the House and Senate both of which are controlled by Republicans after Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm vetoed it. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
11 posted on
09/14/2005 6:30:22 PM PDT by
burzum
(Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
To: HHKrepublican
NOW MORE THAN EVER: JANICE RODGERS BROWN TO THE SUPREME COURT!
12 posted on
09/14/2005 6:30:28 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: HHKrepublican
Every Democrat should be allowed free, unlimited abortions and sterilizations. In fact, I'd be in favor of fourth trimester abortions for all registered DemocRATs and self proclaimed liberals, and members of liberal constituencies.
14 posted on
09/14/2005 6:32:02 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Liberals preach comity and practice calumny.)
To: HHKrepublican
Nominated by William J. Clinton on March 9, 1994
To: HHKrepublican
Right to kill trumps right to life. Only in America.
17 posted on
09/14/2005 6:35:05 PM PDT by
Raycpa
To: HHKrepublican
Today was a big day for judicial activism!
To: HHKrepublican
I think this judge should be made to observe this procedure
at close range. She might change her mind after she tosses
her cookies.
To: HHKrepublican
I wasn't aware that infanticide was constitutional.
To: HHKrepublican
...that opponents call partial-birth abortion.
This is from fox news? a little bias there folks.
To: HHKrepublican; Coleus
What a biased headline. "Judge: Michigan law against *type of abortion* unconstitutional"? That's even worse than the usual "certain type of late-term abortion" that weenie liberals use because they refuse to use the more descriptive "partial-birth abortion." Pretty soon, liberals won't even use the word "abortion" (NARAL already paved the way) and the headline when a judge strikes down a PBA ban will read "Judge: Michigan law against *type of emergency contraception* unconstitutional." (Has anybody else noticed how the media now uses the phrase "emergency contraception" as a synonym for abortion?)
28 posted on
09/14/2005 6:41:50 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
To: HHKrepublican
This is incredible. Apparently this judge (and many more) cares nothing about the testimony given by the guy soon to become our new Chief Justice. Or about life itself.
Gee, is there no implied right to LIFE present in the Constitution???
34 posted on
09/14/2005 6:45:43 PM PDT by
alancarp
(Will hack code for oil)
To: HHKrepublican
36 posted on
09/14/2005 6:50:14 PM PDT by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: HHKrepublican; All
Partial Birth Abortion Ban is due to come up before the US Supreme Court shortly... I don't know if it is in the October session and if Bush can get another Justice on the court...
37 posted on
09/14/2005 6:53:09 PM PDT by
topher
(America the Beautiful! May God continue to bless our great country!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson