Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There are two stories linked above related to the historic 1997 Red River Valley flood. I'm not sure if I'm linking them correctly on here so please accept my apologies!! But at any rate Fargo, ND was flooded April 14, 1997 and President Clinton visited the area 8 days later on April 22, 1997 and was hailed by CNN as the "consoler-in-chief" and NOT hammered by the media, the Governor of ND, or the Mayors of Fargo or Grand Forks as being uncaring or racist for not visiting the area for 8 days!
1 posted on 09/14/2005 2:27:31 PM PDT by JohnRand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: JohnRand

Well, you see, he was too busy feeling their pain.


2 posted on 09/14/2005 2:29:21 PM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

Good find.


4 posted on 09/14/2005 2:31:09 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

OK, I'll bite, why...?

5 posted on 09/14/2005 2:31:44 PM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
BILL CLINTON DOESN'T CARE ABOUT POOR WHITE FARMERS!

I want someone to find the Sink-Stainer's schedule for that week....I want to know what was more important than visiting the citizens of this country who were being flooded out!!

6 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:24 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

Clinton never visited the WTC site in February '93 either.


7 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:27 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

And the area is still not rebuilt. I ber NO gets done before ND does.


8 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:49 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Because he could.

-PJ

9 posted on 09/14/2005 2:33:23 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

If CNN sees this, they'll delete the archived HTML file.


11 posted on 09/14/2005 2:34:48 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
I heard on Rush's show this week, that Clinton's FEMA was 30 days getting in an area after hurricane Floyd (I think it was) because of so much flooding.

I'm sorry I don't remember the state though. I zoned in on the "30 days" and "Clinton's FEMA" and didn't commit the rest to memory.
12 posted on 09/14/2005 2:35:20 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

bittt


13 posted on 09/14/2005 2:35:41 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Bill was busy with the issues of State !!!!
14 posted on 09/14/2005 2:36:02 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

It was the one time in his life when he really WAS compassionate.

15 posted on 09/14/2005 2:36:21 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
"I'll be right there"
16 posted on 09/14/2005 2:38:38 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

It took 8 days becasue there's no hurry when you're a dem.

Clinton was a hero for showing up after 8 days. Same flood, same time, and had it been Bush, he would have been the goat.

Two standards. One for them, one for us.

17 posted on 09/14/2005 2:39:46 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Archive those stories now. It's guaranteed the Leftists will be removing them soon!
18 posted on 09/14/2005 2:41:50 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

Not too many votes available for Ol' Slick out in that area.


19 posted on 09/14/2005 2:48:45 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

It was nasty, dangerous and what good would it have done? He probably figured he would wait until it was COMPLETELY safe. I don't blame him. He has a family too and I wouldn't want MY husband down there when they didn't and STILL don't appreciate what he was doing.


20 posted on 09/14/2005 2:50:01 PM PDT by WasDougsLamb (just my opinion. Go easy on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

Flooding wasn't nearly so bad, and the National Guard had it pretty well under control, and Clinton was a Democrat so *shhhhhh!!!*


21 posted on 09/14/2005 2:50:34 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand

Our first "black" President Just didn't care about white folk!


22 posted on 09/14/2005 3:03:02 PM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnRand
Why? You ask why?

It was Bush's fault, of course!
25 posted on 09/14/2005 4:43:50 PM PDT by NonLinear (He's dead, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson