Oh man, this is rich!
1 posted on
09/14/2005 5:13:03 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: ovrtaxt
Anyone who would pay for Maureen Dowd and Paul Krugman is too stupid to be allowed out in public.
2 posted on
09/14/2005 5:14:43 AM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
To: ovrtaxt
PAY for access to Dowd, Krugman, et al?
That's like building a turnstile and ticket booth at the county dump!
3 posted on
09/14/2005 5:14:43 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(Stop the looting! The IRS hates competition.)
To: ovrtaxt
LOL, this is going to tank fasst!
4 posted on
09/14/2005 5:15:22 AM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: ovrtaxt
The NYT is desperate for revenue.
To: ovrtaxt
DNC talking points clearing house.
To: ovrtaxt
8 posted on
09/14/2005 5:18:14 AM PDT by
cloud8
(No more pix of Helen Thomas or Ted Kennedy!!)
To: ovrtaxt
9 posted on
09/14/2005 5:18:34 AM PDT by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: ovrtaxt
I wouldn't give them my name for a free look, It would be a cold day in a blast furnace that I'll pay!
Ha ha!
10 posted on
09/14/2005 5:19:20 AM PDT by
Barney59
(I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it.)
To: ovrtaxt
"If the Times' idea catches on, this really could be the beginning of the end of the current state of Internet news." Common sense tells me that this could be the beginning of the end of the NYTimes...
To: ovrtaxt
Unfortunately, these aweful syndicated columnists are still available in other newspapers. Not sure about online though, but I can certainly type out a quote as well as the next guy.
14 posted on
09/14/2005 5:21:42 AM PDT by
meyer
(The DNC prefers advancing the party at the expense of human lives.)
To: ovrtaxt
"If the Times' idea catches on, this really could be the beginning of the end of the current state of Internet news."LOL! They wish.
To: ovrtaxt
Can the slime spell irrelevancy?
16 posted on
09/14/2005 5:23:54 AM PDT by
bubman
To: ovrtaxt
you could still go to www.cpusa.org and get the same for free
To: ovrtaxt
19 posted on
09/14/2005 5:26:33 AM PDT by
Broker
(Semper Fi)
To: ovrtaxt
Pay for maureen dowd and paul krugman? LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!
They'd have to pay me! No, wait a minute. They couldn't pay me enough money to get me to read either one of them! LOLOL!
21 posted on
09/14/2005 5:27:04 AM PDT by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
To: ovrtaxt
Glad their putting these Slimes loons "behind bars" so to speak. I wish them all the financial success they deserve.
24 posted on
09/14/2005 5:32:47 AM PDT by
Cautor
To: ovrtaxt
I think the New York Times has hit on the next big idea in modern media -- the use of on-line subscriptions to launder money and circumvent campaign finance restrictions.
25 posted on
09/14/2005 5:34:47 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: ovrtaxt
This is great. It will help to slow the spread of leftist propaganda.
26 posted on
09/14/2005 5:36:11 AM PDT by
frankjr
(I demand a Congressional Investigation!!!! What was the question again?)
To: ovrtaxt
LOL! To think of paying good money for Mo or Navel-gazer Brooks...
27 posted on
09/14/2005 5:37:28 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
MEMO TO THE TIMES:
ALL YOUR COLUMNS ARE BELONG TO US.
HUGS AND KISSES,
FREE REPUBLIC
29 posted on
09/14/2005 5:45:30 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(Stop the looting! The IRS hates competition.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson