If you claim these, you can have them, but they don't alter the physical history of the universe as proposed by mainstream science.
I don't believe ID requires irreducible complexity, but that it would definitively prove ID. There is a lack of irreducible complexity in many of mankind's creations, yet the ID remains.
It wouldn't prove anything except that we don't know the full history of everything.
But we already know that we don't know everything. Scientists would be unemployed if we did.