Please. You've been on these threads long enough to know that scientific theories are never knowably true. It is a category mistake to speak of truth and scientific theories.
Or have I misunderstood you? Since you do know this and you still say "truth ... of an ID hypothesis" are you then admitting that ID is not a scientific theory? Very clever.
To the contrary, I specifically addressed the differences between science and engineering in my previous post.
Yes, I see now that you did toward the end. And yet in the beginning of your post you conflate them.
Your challenge makes no sense.
I will try to explain. A scientific theory has two parts. There is a deductive, axiomatic theory and a physical interpretation of the terms of the theory. A scientific theory explains some phenomenon if the phenomenon is the interpration of a statement which is a theorem of the theory. Such phenomena are called predictions of the theory. If they are observed they are called confirming evidence of the theory.
Now I hope that is clear. Lets see you employ ID theory to make a testable prediction.
Not much time for a thorough response, but let me ask you this: are you saying that science has no way to deal with engineering?