Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Damage To Groton-based Sub Is Worse Than Expected [USS Philadelphia]
The Day [New London CT] ^ | 9/10/05 | ROBERT A. HAMILTON

Posted on 09/13/2005 3:39:58 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Registration req'd at source so don't know if link will work.
1 posted on 09/13/2005 3:40:01 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; Bottom_Gun; Dog Gone; HipShot; ...
Steely-eyed Killers of the Deep (((PING!!!)))

2 posted on 09/13/2005 3:43:47 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru ("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

I'm guessing that there aren't a lot of available spook-boats waiting to take its place.


3 posted on 09/13/2005 3:46:37 PM PDT by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Earl's body shop should fix 'em up good.


4 posted on 09/13/2005 3:46:58 PM PDT by Wiseghy (Discontent is the want of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. – Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Well I guess this IS the first time a sub has been run over by a merchant since WWII rammings.

Can the Navy hold the run-over-ee as liable as the run-over-er (if the sub can't dive out of danger because of the shallow waterr ule.

Shouldn't the CO have dove anyway? At PD already?


5 posted on 09/13/2005 3:48:06 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

From now on it will always pull to the left.

I know my truck always did.


6 posted on 09/13/2005 3:55:26 PM PDT by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix off of my ping list as I have been asked to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Chit it was a Turkish ship wasn't it? Remember how they helped with the invasion of Iraq.

CO should have put a torpedo in him.

7 posted on 09/13/2005 4:10:52 PM PDT by skimbell (ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Can the Navy hold the run-over-ee as liable as the run-over-er (if the sub can't dive out of danger because of the shallow waterr ule.

The sub was the stand-on vessel, being overtaken if this give-way vessel was more than 22.5 degrees abaft the beam. Was the sub on the surface displaying proper lights? (0200 time) International rules apply here. What was the visibility? Was rule 19 in effect?

Yet no where in the rules does it encourage the stand-on vessel to allow a collision to occur, just because they are the stand-on vessel. The giveway vessel always has the mother-load share of the burden to react in several levels of action, depending on the particular triggers of WX, geometries, plot, visual bearings, both ships characteristics, the heirarchy, subtle and obvious behaviors, any radio comms, etc., if it becomes apparent that the stand-on vessel is not taking appropriate action.

Been teaching this for the USCG in their simulators for 14 years, after I did my 20.

I see this as another case I'd like to see drawn up and installed in the simulators. The ensuing debrief discussions can get quite lively. Not nearly enough facts presented in any articles, anywhere, to begin to judge anyone at fault.

Regardless, in every case, both parties will have a piece of the "at-fault pie" You just always want your piece to be very, very small.

8 posted on 09/13/2005 4:13:26 PM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

But how in the heck does the skipper of the sub NOT know that they have a ship bearing down on them? All ahead full, come left x number of degrees. sheesh. (Maybe it was a stealth merchant ship)


9 posted on 09/13/2005 4:17:17 PM PDT by rivercat (Welcome to California. Now go home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

The captain probably needs to polish up his resume.


10 posted on 09/13/2005 4:20:03 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

Arrrgh, Matey. What language ye be talkin'?


11 posted on 09/13/2005 4:20:39 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech
Was the sub on the surface displaying proper lights?

Do you really think so? I doubt they had a radar reflector up either.

12 posted on 09/13/2005 4:24:56 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Four words. The skipper is toast.


13 posted on 09/13/2005 4:25:50 PM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Since the Philadelphia is the second oldest Los Angeles Class boat out there, she may end up being scrapped. Some of the newer boats have been. Just more work for the Jimmy Carter.


14 posted on 09/13/2005 4:33:17 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Can the Navy hold the run-over-ee as liable as the run-over-er (if the sub can't dive out of danger because of the shallow waterr ule.
Shouldn't the CO have dove anyway? At PD already?

The collision occurred at 0230 on a moonless night just outside of Bahrain, in what I assume were close quarters. An earlier article by the same reporter (respected in the Submarine community, BTW) said Philly was in the unenviable position of being the 'privileged' vessel because she was being overtaken by the Turk, thus restricting Philly's ability to maneuver. IOW, Philly had the right of way ... dead right, as the olde saw has it.

At night, an overtaking ship can only see the other guy's stern light, so without view of the other guy's sidelights there's little info on 'target's' precise heading, etc. It would not shock me to find out the Turk's radar was inop, or even that there was no lookout posted. Even if a lookout was posted, a surfaced sub would be nearly invisible; moonless night, lots of lights on horizon from Bahrain as confusion factors.

Question for other sub guys, particularly NAV folks: where is the stern light on modern boats located - on the sail, or on the rudder? I remember a white light on top of the rudder back in my days

15 posted on 09/13/2005 4:38:37 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru ("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desron13; PAR35
Four words. The skipper is toast.

Not necessarily, though I won't deny it's highly likely. We don't have ALL the facts; the inevitable board of inquiry will have all the facts.

I have had the experience of being subjected to an attempt to run me down by a larger vessel. Was it intentional? I don't know, but it sure seemed like it at the time! I took evasive action and the GD other ship changed course to intersect mine. I flashed a light, attempted to contact on ship-ship VHF ... nada for a response. I'm here to tell the tale, so I obviously survived - by making a last minute zig when I was close enough to where he couldn't see me under his bow.

Should a captain be canned because another vessel made an insane and unexpected move? I think not, but we'll both see how events turn out, eh?

16 posted on 09/13/2005 4:54:50 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru ("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Manmy questions from a land-lubber:

Doesn't the sub have a rear-view mirror? (smile)
Seriously, what about the radar, why did they not pick this Turk beast coming up behind them?
Or this a serious weakness the enemy could exploit?
Also, do they keep computer records on all the activity, like a 'black box' you find on airplanes, to determine what was happening before the crash?
I imagine the commander will lose his job over this, no matter how little of the guilt he bears?
Is it true the navy personnel do not like to serve on a ship/submarine that has been in a collision, or is that only on the really major collisions?


17 posted on 09/13/2005 5:01:59 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Many questions from a land-lubber:

Doesn't the sub have a rear-view mirror? (smile)
Seriously, what about the radar, why did they not pick this Turk beast coming up behind them?
Or this a serious weakness the enemy could exploit?
Also, do they keep computer records on all the activity, like a 'black box' you find on airplanes, to determine what was happening before the crash?
I imagine the commander will lose his job over this, no matter how little of the guilt he bears?
Is it true the navy personnel do not like to serve on a ship/submarine that has been in a collision, or is that only on the really major collisions?


18 posted on 09/13/2005 5:02:19 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru
They have a nice selection of posters (including that one IIRC) displayed in the submarine museum near the USS Bowfin at Pearl Harbor.

It's a wonderful museum... the displays are in a chronological order of the history of subs, and item descriptions are at most a paragraph or two, which makes them easy to read (more is not necessarily better in case displays IMO). I was disappointed, however, that "Vote Strom Thurmond" memorabilia was missing from the Hunley display. :-]

If anyone here is planning a trip to the Arizona Memorial and/or Missouri, do yourself a big favor and allow time for the Bowfin and sub museum (same location, next to the Arizona memorial).

19 posted on 09/13/2005 5:17:28 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal (As it was in the days of NO...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

What is it with the USS Philadelphia & muslims?

Didn't something similar happen 200 years ago?


20 posted on 09/13/2005 7:32:05 PM PDT by Casekirchen (If allah is just another name for the Judeo-Christian God, why do the islamics pray to a rock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson