'Nuff said. Your word on the matter means nothing Tom.
Hoplite,
What are you talking about? Of course I have references.....I will have to search for the Bondsteel Security Meeting Report and my personal notes on the interview I had with the examiner.
Also, I don't have to prove anything to you because you are either a coward for avoiding Holbrookes speech, the proof already presented on the various issues....you seem to avoid the issues that are laid before you. You look for holes and whatever points you can twist into a negative. You avoid the facts and the positives. Actually, I don't even post to you as it makes no difference either way.
You are inept and very deceptive about your answers and your questions. If I didn't know better I would think that you were one of those geeky type of lawyers. Remember, even hell hates a rubber backbone....rubber smells bad burning......:))
When you can drop the attitude, come up with facts, I'll gladly agree or acknowledge that you are correct and I learn something. Also you do the same, otherwise, keep up the attitude and you become a poster of little signficance.