Precedent is always respected. That doesn't mean that it is always the deciding factor of a succeeding case. There are different factors, respected all, of which precedent is one. Your statements do nothing to help in this critical period.
Can you say for a fact that Roberts will vote to overturn Roe? The justice he is replacing did. So, why in the hell aren't conservatives demanding a sure thing rather than very questionable maybe?
It's very possible this nomination will move the court to the left.