Posted on 09/13/2005 5:01:31 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
I'd disagree with Roberts re the court's authority to decide what the Costitution means. It does have that authority, but not exclusively. That is also an authority held by the Executive and Legislative Branches
There are a few here who say that Specter purposely led off with questions on Roe to "muddy the waters" for when the Dems get out the long knives..
yes, the Grassley
There is nothing finer than watching a skilled advocate at work -- particularly on moot court type questions. Roberts really took Leahy to school for what I saw.
then Grassley
I wonder if any dem will dare to ask about eminent domain.
Yeah, Specter was ghoulish in his mulishness about preserving Roe
Roberts is taking the "Locker" decision to task...something about setting the work hours for a baker...does anyone know what this decision is about?
It's not Al..never was...for two reasons..two much effort ewas expended getting him to Justice..and there is too much work to do, to pull him out now, and go throught another hearing for AG..but Al doesn't want the job..he wants to go intot he private sector after 2008 and make some big $$$..to provide for his family..that's the real reason why not..
I didn't get my first pair of jeans till 12th grade. I had to wear dresses and Mary Janes, not even penny loafers...too casual. Sneakers were only (I repeat only), for Phys Ed.
Sounds like a blatant case of legislating from the bench.
I heard on the radio that the President will address the nation on Thursday about Katrina recovery...from New Orleans.
Hey
I wonder if they will ask about the Federalist Society..
I see my telepathy is working.
"The next appointee will be a woman. Among other considerations, Laura Bush wants the President to nominate a woman."
Disgusting.
The next nominee should be the person most qualified. If there are a bunch of people most qualified, flip a frigging coin or something - but picking someone on the basis of race/sex/etc. is just playing the feelgood PR game that, as conservatives, we're supposed to be fighting AGAINST.
Maybe, but based solely on what I'm reading on this thread, what will happen is that the libs and the media will be wetting themselves with excitement tonight, thinking that Specter is on their side.
"Even some of the Republicans are expressing their concerns about Roberts! This throws the whole nomination, widely seen as a shoo-in, into serious doubt!" </MSM spin>
And, Roberts will likely dice Schumer and Kennedy to pieces. This guy is extremely sharp. Schumer is not...
We all said that a month ago and wound up with Roberts. GWB is much to unpredictable to predict what he is going to do with any certainty.
There certainly are a lot of good women to pick from like Brown, Owen, Jones, and Corrigan among others.
LOL, I heare CNN has asked their DEM buddies to show "anger" during the interviews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.