Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: From many - one.

It's the other gods. When the proto-Hebrews created the Genesis story, they were surrounded by people with lots of gods. Like most folks back then, they accepted the validity of the existence of those gods, but assumed their God was the big kid on the block. Indeed, through much of the OT, the assumption is that other gods do exist (Baal, the gods of the Egyptians) but that the Israelite God is more powerful than any of them. I'm not sure that the concept of God as a singular entity in that domain really took hold until a couple of centuries after Christ.


1,138 posted on 09/15/2005 5:53:41 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1082 | View Replies ]


To: Junior

Of a piece with "no other gods before me".

So an omniscient God speaks of a none existent we.

I wonder how the literalists explain it.


1,150 posted on 09/15/2005 6:13:40 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies ]

To: Junior

Tutankhamen did attempt to push montheism onto Egypt.


1,164 posted on 09/15/2005 6:43:05 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson