OK, show me where in the theory of evolution God appears.
but as for me, I'll still stick with being created in the image of God, you want to call a rock grandpaw go right ahead, but as for me, Abba Father will do, thank you.
OK, show me in ANY scientific discipline where God appears.
By your logic, 2+2=4 denies the existance of god because god does not appear in the teaching of math. Likewise, teaching basic grammer is akin to teaching atheism because god is not mentioned when learning the ABCs. Must be a strange world to live in with your logic.
OK, show me where in the theory of evolution God appears.
Show me where in the theories of embryology and human development God appears.
Recall that the Bible (and in some cases God himself) repeatedly affirms that God is intimately and actively involved in the physical creation of individual humans in the womb. For instance He "shapes" and "molds" the human body in the womb, He covers it with "skin and flesh," He "knits it together" of "bone and sinew". (Job 10:8-12) Else where he "forms inward parts," etc.
Surely, unless you can show me where God appears in the theory, you must concede that embryology is atheistic, and must at least be opposed by a competing theory of embryological creationism?
...of course we must also have theistic long division as an alternative to the atheistic version which fails to mention God, but that need is maybe too obvious to even mention...