Well, that one made me smile--I'm glad there is still a sense of humour.
But there is also a sense of evasion, unless I have missed a post. Bluepistolero assured us that if Dr. Eckleburg was a Christian Reconstructionist, then that was good enough for him, too. Dr Eckleburg assured us, I am pretty sure, she was not a Christian Reconstructionist, but a Presbyterian.
I'm not at all interested in playing 'What's My Denomination'; but I either didn't receive or else didn't spot an answer to my point about the relationship between someone who styles herself a Presbyterian and promotes literature by North & Co. -- the quotes RWP posted from these Christian Reconstructionists were pretty obnoxious.
So, do either of you Dr. E or bluepistolero, care to comment on the North quotes themselves?
bluepistolero
One thing that just occurred to me, re the Discovery Institute, is that not only was it funded by Howard Ahmanson, who is also the funder of the Chalcedon Institute, the big daddy of all Reconstructionist outfits, but that Dembski himself was active in the conservative Presbyterian renaissance at Princeton Theological Seminary. Cornelius Van Til, the conservative Presbyterian theologian at Princeton, is the intellectual father of Reconstructionism.
Dembski is way too slick to publicly associate himself with Reconstruction, but I wonder if he's a closet CR?