Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan; calex59; SierraWasp
My post from the old thread:
http://www.fairdistricts.com/Initiative_Text.asp

I noticed some stuff in here that I had not noticed before in the selection of the 3 "Special Masters." (That term gives me the shivers)

--The "Judicial Council" first "nominates" 24 judges.

--Perata(D), Nunez(D), McCarthy(R), and Ackerman(R) then get to select 3 of those 24 (each) as candidates for "Special Master", (reducing the pool to 12).

--BUT--they can only select candidates NOT in their own party. So, the only GOP possible nominees would have to be selected by Perata and Nunez. While the same is true on the other side of the aisle (McCarthy/Ackerman selecting Dems), I see the left as playing a much dirtier game.


19 posted on 09/12/2005 12:08:46 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

The more information we glean, the worse this proposition is beginning to look.


22 posted on 09/12/2005 12:45:17 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson