Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

1. "How then can "oil" be routinely discovered tens of thousands of feet down."

To the best of my knowledge, oil has never been discovered below 15,000.

Indeed, temperatures below 12,500 feet are generally above 275F (varies by your kneck of the woods), which breaks down hydrocarbons, giving you, if lucky, methane.

2. I am not discounting the possibility of abiotic hydrocarbons -- merely discounting the idea that the oil and gas we use is abiotic. (But, as stated in my first post, perhaps the reefs we use as markers may merely be capturing the hydrocarbons.)

Regardless of source, the reefs are there, which was the point of my post.

MeanWestTexan, PE (petro)


48 posted on 09/12/2005 12:57:28 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (A good friend helps you move. A great friend helps you move a body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

The question as to the origin of oil has always interested me as a microbiologist. Clearly coal is of plant origin, but oil is trickier. The presence of biological like compounds in oil does not have to show biological origin, the oil could have been contaminated at a later date. The presence of bacteria in almost all oil fields permits this possibility along with the possibility for underground migration which surely has occurred in some areas. I'd say the preponderance of evidence is for biological origin, but the evidence is not unambiguous.


50 posted on 09/12/2005 1:04:39 PM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson