From the article, it appears God had decided....these were patients with no hope of survival, so I can surmise from your post, that rather than having a more merciful death, you would have just left them behind to die, have them linger painfully and have their situation exacerbated by dehydration or starvation?
Incorrect...these were patients whom doctors decided had no hope of survival. Big difference.
so I can surmise from your post, that rather than having a more merciful death, you would have just left them behind to die, have them linger painfully and have their situation exacerbated by dehydration or starvation?
I would have let God decide instead of playing God. Using suffering as justification for killing is a dangerous philosophy.