Posted on 09/10/2005 10:50:09 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
I agree.
This is the comment I sought to address. Until the water goes down, I'm not for forcing people to go back home.
Do they have as much right to access their homes as those who remain in their homes? Yes I believe they do, however having taken the step to leave their home, I would not facilitate returning them now.
The rescue workers should be able to focus their attention on the ill, the dead, the removal of the water and the restoration of power and some semblence of normalcy.
Then I'd let more people into the area.
The public officials may not like it, but at some point water trucks may be necessary to service people when they return to their homes.
My trading resembles something more like outsider trading.
"Sunnyside you never fail to be on the wrong side of an issue!"
...
And the right side of every issue would be of course, YOUR view (drone). Unlike you who views everyone and thing as if it were simply hypothetical paper work, I don't view human lives and their health simply as "issues", that would be the easy way out.
You know best for everyone and whatever you do - don't apply the CONSTITUTION to it - after all is the law of the land. Of course if the Constitution was to hit you in the head you wouldn't know what it was.
The scary thing is that you can't even see the DANGER of the government NOT FOLLOWING ITS OWN LAWS. The post 2000 freeper is unable to comprehend that Hillary is only 200,000 votes in Ohio from winning the next election and if Bush can ignore the Constitution she can too.
I highly doubt that. BTW, we live in a city with a refinery. Should we leave town too?! We have lived here our entire lives and it hasn't killed us yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.