You're absolutely right, though they claim otherwise.
However, I do think it's useful to debate liberals on-line for a number of reasons.
First of all, you get to learn their game. They really only have a half dozen or less arrows in their quiver and, once you identify them, it's not hard to stay two jumps ahead.
The ultimate value in debating liberals on-line however is with a view towards the future - the possibility of shaping public opinion before a neutral audience.
So many conservatives I've seen on talking head shows (with the exceptions of the masters like Ann Coulter) get blindsided by ridiculous liberal attacks that they should have seen coming.
Unacceptable...
LDoc
Ps I didn't realize even FreeRepublic was so divided. Thanks for the heads up.
You're absolutely right, though they claim otherwise.
However, I do think it's useful to debate liberals on-line for a number of reasons.
First of all, you get to learn their game. They really only have a half dozen or less arrows in their quiver and, once you identify them, it's not hard to stay two jumps ahead.
The ultimate value in debating liberals on-line however is with a view towards the future - the possibility of shaping public opinion before a neutral audience.
So many conservatives I've seen on talking head shows (with the exceptions of the masters like Ann Coulter) get blindsided by ridiculous liberal attacks that they should have seen coming.
Unacceptable...
LDoc
Ps I didn't realize even FreeRepublic was so divided. Thanks for the heads up.