Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Heyworth
I think that in the case of the navigation laws (which were modeled on Britain's similar laws), there's a greater national good to be obtained. The encouragement of a vigorous trading fleet is a good thing, and after a period of protection it might stand on its own.

The original Navigation Act of 1789 was one of the first laws passed by the newly constituted United States for a reason. When you consider that ocean going sailing ships were the most complex, technologically advanced modes of warfare and troop transport of that time, it was wise to protect and develop a domestic shipbuilding industry.

As far as I know we still don't let France or China build our aircraft carriers or space rockets.

958 posted on 10/12/2005 8:23:36 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck; Heyworth
As far as I know we still don't let France or China build our aircraft carriers or space rockets.

Check your facts. Anything more high tech than a spatula has about a 95% probability that it contains foreign-made parts. That carrier will be made in the USA of the finest Japanese steel money can buy, then loaded with millions of Thai semiconductors packaged in Mexico and mounted to Canadian PWB's before being put into Taiwanese castings and bolted into the ship.

963 posted on 10/13/2005 3:27:02 AM PDT by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson