Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
The most capable tactical commanders were clearly allied with the confederacy, while the Union had the upper hand on the larger strategy that would later win the war.

Let's see. Hood, Ewell, Beauregard, both Johnstons, Polk, Bragg, Hill, Pillow, Pemberton, and on and on and on. Yep, tactical geniuses, all of them.

Other than Jackson and Lee, and maybe Forrest, the south was sadly lacking in 'capable tactical commanders'. Compare that with Grant and Sherman and Thomas and Reynolds and Hancock and McPherson and Sheridan and numerous others. The North comes out the winner.

323 posted on 09/15/2005 4:00:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur; mac_truck
I thought I already went over this: Grant and Sherman were the top strategic commanders, who had the larger vision to win the war... didn't I use almost those exact words? Maybe I made the post in "Virginia ratification" style, and so only certain words mattered?
338 posted on 09/16/2005 3:49:52 AM PDT by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson