What a very strange statement, considering what I do.
If somebody decides to put on the klans' hood, they ARE klan. 100%. And are to be treated / reviled as such [Terrorist of a different stripe].
So why aren't they shot on sight? You apparently missed my point, which is that the Klan is evil beyond simple racism - someone might join because they are anti-Jewish (thank you Mark for letting me know that it is proper to always capitalize; did not know that previously), or because they are anti-Catholic, or because they are anti-internationilst/xenophobes.
Your laughable assumption that I 'defended' anyone associated with that org is misplaced; cowboyway stated (correctly) that anyone seen in the garb could be 'assumed' to be racist, and you and others attacked him for it.
Don't care what you "allegedly" do. Credibility is the word. You can allegedly be whoever you want to be (ask stand watie :)) on the web so don't bother.
"So why aren't they shot on sight?" I don't think I can help you with this as it seems from left field. Are you looking for the easy pictures or something in this thread? You will improve comprehension by actually reading all the words instead. "[Terrorist of a different stripe]" was what I included in the reference to the klan. Maybe there was some difference noted....maybe.....duhhhhhh.
"Your laughable assumption that I 'defended' anyone associated...."
Liar. Where did I vocalize this "assumption"?
It is tiring having your type rewrite postings to fit your preconceptions.
"At least you have the sense to blast the klan for what they are..."
THAT IS WHAT I WROTE ABOUT YOU. Got it? Read all the words.....not just the pictures. LOL!!!!
That statement is false and is a pretty good example of the sly, underhanded game you Rockwellians play on here. Cowboyway posted a 1925 photo of hundreds of klansmen marching with American flags in front of the Capital building in Washington DC. When I pointed out that the photo was from a period before the CBF was politicized by the dixiecrats, he said the following.
[cowboyway] The point of the photo is to show that the Stars and Bars ain't the only flag that has been used for racial purposes, assuming that the Klansmen in the photo were racist.
I don't need you or anyone else to interpret what that dumb little cracker meant, anymore than I need Dan Rather to explain the news to me. The fact that he's got a photo of the klan's founder displayed on his homepage along with links to a site advocating Southern independence from the United States by all honourable means necessary just backs up my claim that he's an active LOSer on this forum.
Are we clear here clownboy, or do you require further remedial attention in this matter?