Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
You continue to present inane and useless points. Look up the definition of blockade. Look up the official records. Do any search you desire. You will find Federal ships arriving on the evening of the 11th and early morning of the 12th. You will find them firing on and seizing commercial shipping. You will find them standing off the bar.

No, you'll find one unflagged ship, approaching in low light, with no evidence that she was known to the Harriet Lane, having a single shot fired across her bow in challenge. She raised her US flag and continued to the bar. Other ships arrived during the evening and night as well and similarly stayed out past the bar, waiting for light to enter. (read the "Star of the West" reports--she did the same thing in waiting off the bar for first light. Charleston was a tricky port to enter and not one to be done with limited nighttime visibility. Here's a description from an army historical paper: "For naval forces to enter the harbor, they are required to pass through a very constricted opening near the harbor entrance. This opening is less than one nautical mile of which the majority is too shallow to allow vessels to enter without running aground. On the southern side of the entrance is Cummings Point on Morris Island, and on the northern side of the entrance is Sullivan's Island. Even flat-bottomed ships are highly constricted by this entrance. Once the ships have passed the harbor entrance, they must travel over five miles before they reach Charleston. During this transit, they must travel slowly to keep from running aground, and are, therefore, highly restricted in their maneuverability."

http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/p4013coll2&CISOPTR=185&REC=5

Now, what merchant captain in his right mind is going to tackle that approach while the harbor is simultaneously the site of an artillery barrage?

As for "seizing commercial shipping", the only seizure you've shown was a single ice schooner, and we've established (despite your curious omission of that single detail) that this occurred after firing on Sumter had commenced.

1,215 posted on 11/29/2005 2:34:58 PM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]


To: Heyworth; stand watie; Gianni; rustbucket
One complete nonsense post. The Harriet Lane fired on the Nashville. The Nashville stopped....all in the O. R.

You do not know anything about "low light", and there is nothing in the O. R. about your contention.

And the "only seizure" is seizure.

You can prattle on and on. Union ships were there, firing, seizing, and threatening.........all in the official records. And nothing you are saying changes that.

So prattle on, and waste energy trying to be right. But you won't be no matter what you post.
1,235 posted on 12/14/2005 6:54:33 AM PST by PeaRidge (non quis sed quid-----'the message is clear; do not ask who says it; examine what is being said.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson