Posted on 09/09/2005 8:56:41 PM PDT by Allan
Fear not Sharia in Ontario
The ongoing brouhaha surrounding Ontario's possible approval of Sharia law
as a basis for legal arbitration of family disputes reflects the suspicions many Westerners harbour toward Islam
in the wake of 9/11 and other terror attacks.
With activists fearing any validation of Sharia in Ontario may lead to similar moves elsewhere,
the issue has attracted international attention:
Yesterday, protest marches took place not only in Toronto and Ottawa,
but also in 10 other cities among them Montreal, Ottawa, Paris and London.
" But while critics are correct to guard against the validation of extreme religious practices,
there is no such risk imminent in Ontario.
Despite all the shrill protests,
Dalton McGuinty's provincial government should "approve the use of Sharia in arbitration,
as recommended in a report by former Ontario attorney general Marion Boyd
nine months ago.
To listen to protesters, such a move Willleave Muslim women victimized
by the overtly sexist principles encoded in centuries-old Islamic law.
According to the most breathless accounts,
women will be kept as virtual slaves, denied divorces, separated from their children,
cheated out of inheritances and devalued as witnesses.
None of this will happen.
To begin with, as with all forms of voluntary arbitration,
Canadian Muslims must opt in before they are bound by Sharia.
The majority of women will not do so if it would mean being transported back to the Middle Ages.
Secondly, any application of Ontario's Arbitration Act is subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
which means judgments discriminating against women would be struck down.
Thirdly, even absent Charter protections, the McGuinty government -
as well as both of the province's opposition parties -
has signalled that implementation of Sharia would be conditiona
l on the protection of women's rights.
(Consequently, as we see it, whatever Muslim arbitration code comes out this process will be so watered down by equality dictates
that it will be a stretch to call it "Sharia" at all.
But that's not the public's problem.)
Fourthly, it is important to remember
that this would not be the first time a traditional religious group has used Ontario's Arbitration Act
to apply its doctrines in the legal sphere.
Orthodox Jews - no great friends of feminism
have been doing so for years,
with little complaint or notice until Muslims decided they wanted the same right.
The fact that such an inconsequential fight has brought Ontario on to the world stage
illustrates how much has changed since Sept. 11, 2001.
Four years ago, most Westerners saw Islam as just another major world religion.
Now, even the most severely bounded application of its tenets is seen as a threat to human rights.
Notwithstanding the barbaric acts
committed by those extremists who purport to be acting in the name of Islam,
Canadians and other Westerners should get beyond this knee-jerk reaction.
In Ontario and elsewhere,
Muslims should enjoy the same legal rights as everyone else.
(Alas)
You're damn right, and it's a well-founded suspicion!
from
"Ataturk, the Rebirth of a Nation"
by Patrick Kinross.
One of Ataturk's first actions
April 8, 1924
in trying to establish a western style state
in Turkey
was to abolish Sharia law
I quote from page 386:
"the religious courts of the Sheriat
which still administered the laws
relating to such matters of family
and personal status as marrige, divorce and inheritance
were closed
and a Civil Code based on that of the Swiss planned
to prevail over all"
I wonder what Ataturk would make of
reintroduction of Shariah law in Canada
in the year 2005!!
Maybe Canada will take over the role of the Ottomans
in the 21st century.
Yeah, except for the suicide bombers, and stuff.
The majority of Muslim women will do so, because they know what kind of hell will be waiting for them at home if they don't.
Can the author truly be this feckless?
"The National Post' is Canada's national 'conservative' newspaper.
(Alas)"
Is it?? I can't stand that paper, or worse, the Globe and Mail. I get most of my news through the internet, and mostly through FR here.
The southern border is not the only one that needs to be closed.
When Is the world ever going to wake up to the obvious attempts by Islam to bastardaize each country they swarm into with their ways and customs at the expense of their hosts. I don't know about the rest of you, but I am damn sick of it, this ain't the United States of Allamerica....
Certainly has me confused, to use a bit of Orwell, they have GOT the same legal rights "double plus good".
I am reminded of this when I read of the treatment of one Mark Harding. Harding,of course got three months of instruction from an Imam- else do six months hard time. Judge said he promoted hate with pamphlets against Islam. Lots of hate by a certain Muslim (Nourhagigi) out of Toronto. (IranSeek)Nothing about making him take bible lessons though.
Ah well, we were told the Asper Family would not interfere with the political bent of the National Post. Now the homosexual abounds with much boosting and the vulgar flash their well clad carcasses on the centre pages. LOL
ping
"My muslim wife loves to be beaten when she disobeys me! See how playfully she cringes when I raise up my fist! Ha ha ha! Of course she votes for sharia law! Don't you? Of course you do. Look, her burka is shaking up and down, that means yes."
Does multiculturalism demand that we sanction barbaric and primitive practices? Get wise, you dreamers, some cultures are a damn sight better than others, they always have been and they always will.
Which of course really isnt saying much, since ALL moral vices act similarly (homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, pedophilia, pornography, drugs, alcohol, gambling, etc)
100 bucks says the first to go will be the city of Hamilton.
The entire article is one elaborate self-deception, perhaps to avoid the ugly truth about what Islam means and exactly how voluntary it is in a culture of "honor killings".
Give them their own land on reservations if they want to practice barbarism and neanderthal culture. Let the land be something they're accustomed to, like the Mojave Desert perpahs. Then let them practice Sharia and we can study them to help understand how mankind lived and survived 1,400 years ago. Maybe Jane Goodall could live amongst them and write another book, "Troglodytes In the Sand".
I think we have some former nuclear testing grounds here in Nevada that might work out....
That's true, and women in relationships with abusive spouses would NEVER stay in those relationships.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.