Posted on 09/09/2005 12:51:13 PM PDT by Black Tooth
Hannity is discussing this article now
What is Hannity saying?
I don't agree with Pat, but I like his passion.
Oh!!! Woe is me!!! Oh!!!
Hannity is basicaly saying its time for supporters and the president to rise to the accusasions and its time for the others , including Pat to Knock it OFF.
Knock if off?
Does this mean that Mayor and Governor should not be held responsible for anything? Should everyone just be quiet now? Or are you referring to something else?
Typical Hannity. He gets paid to simply read the standard GOP talking points every day.
Not exactly! If this were to happen, Bush would be given carte blanche to go nuclear.
Well, the fact is the fedgov on down to those morons in LA was ill prepared for this entire fiasco......I'm sure to the Bushbots Mr. Brown Being relieved of his duties today is irrelevant of course. Just another example of an ill-prepared political hack with a "dubious" resume being handed a job through the efforts of an old college chum.
Anyone with half a brain (or even one tied behind his back) should be able to see Buchanan is trying to bring to the attention of mind-numbed left/right, Rep/Dem, lib/conserv paradigm that through runaway trade and budget deficits, open border "idiotology", free trade at all costs, pork barreling, nationbuilding, etc. this spending spree will encumber future generations with tremendous financial misery.
Buchanan has been right on illegal immigration and it's destructive effects on our economy, some of these idiotic trade deals that are nothing more groundwork for setting up the new American Union (ala the EU), fedgov control of education with GOALS2000 (right out of the Marxist playbook), etc. so bleat all you want he's been a better conservative than most of these limp wristed RINO'S we've had to endure for so long.
Very good post.
You nailed it. Hopefully the Bots will soon awake from their slumber.
So - what does all this have to do with Washington?
After looking back at the last two years or so, I don't think that would happen. I really don't.
To go nuclear on whom? Man, I think you're dreaming.
I think he was talking about energy policy not a military response when he said "nuclear."
More generalizations, over statements, back biting, undercutting, political maneuverings from Patsy.
So irrelevant.
This is a bad article. All it says is that somehow Katrina confirms Pat's isolationist views?
It’s not just Pat.
This is one of those weird events that everybody seems to be molding into proof of their chosen political/class/environmental/sociological/psychological theories, no matter how disparate and irrelevant.
Sometimes a hurricane is just a hurricane.
No, he talked of going nuclear in response to a major act of terrorism. I hardly think building a nuclear plant would be an appropriate response to, say, a chem/bio attack in Manhattan.
My mistake then, I thought it was something to do with cutting reliance on foreign oil etc...
Yes, nuclear response is kind of a nutty thing.
Thanks, but this lacks anything specific. More of a generalization.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.