Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
Basically what he's saying is anything but Microsoft will work here.... Even if the closed source did everything he needed and was cheaper to install/run/maintain, he'd still go with OSS.

Exactly. Because some business requirements require sticking to established standards instead of a wink and a promise. You can't archive documents and expect to be able to read them in 100 years if the "standard" keeps changing every software release. So if Microsoft can't support the standard (and it can't -- because it must maintain some kind of lock-in leverage), it doesn't meet requirements, and some people will look elsewhere.

17 posted on 09/09/2005 10:19:13 PM PDT by TechJunkYard (my other PC is a 9406)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: TechJunkYard

Yeah, because standards never change. But so what, OSS doesn't guarantee open standards, all it is is open source. There is a HUGE difference.


18 posted on 09/09/2005 10:23:56 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson