[sheltonmac]

Because you took the opportunity to belittle the work our troops do. Because you tried to chip away at the morale of the troops and their families. Shame on you.

So the "work our troops do" is always noble and necessary, no matter what? I'm not trying to chip away at anyone's morale. I simply agree with Rep. Paul. But I suppose you consider him to be a treasonous scoundrel as well.

[BykrBayb]

You specifically attacked my position that my son is fighting so that hopefully I won't have to. You suggested that I don't know what the hell is going on because I value the service of my son. Shove it!

[Stultis]

So the "work our troops do" is always noble and necessary, no matter what? I'm not trying to chip away at anyone's morale. I simply agree with Rep. Paul.

Yes, you clearly do. You even employ the same logical fallacies. (Complex Question and False Dilemma.)

[Mr. Silverback]

So the "work our troops do" is always noble and necessary, no matter what?

Please feel to detail what are troops are doing in Iraq that is ignoble. How many terrorists have you killed this year?

But I suppose you consider him to be a treasonous scoundrel as well.

Being an idiot does not make one a traitor. Neither does being a liar. But when he lies in his polemic essay, he does come awful close. You might have the excuse of ignorance. Paul doesn't.

[Mr. Silverback]

BTW, for the reasons I use the term "lie," see my posts 126 and 130 in this thread.

[pfony1]

If Ron Paul used logic and facts to support his positions -- I might say he was part of a "loyal opposition".

But, since Ron Paul uses false statements to "support" his anti-American positions -- the word "traitor" is apt.

Anyone who listened to GWB's State of the Union Address knows that Ron Paul is lying...