Skip to comments.
Fishing Captain Files Claim After Possible Run-in With Submarine
New London Day ^
| 9/9/5
| JOE WOJTAS
Posted on 09/09/2005 7:42:49 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Oops
1
posted on
09/09/2005 7:42:50 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
I think he needs a bigger boat.
2
posted on
09/09/2005 7:43:57 AM PDT
by
Hoodlum91
(don't ask me...you really don't want to know)
To: SmithL
gear became entangled with one of the two U.S. submarines... How does he know they were U.S. Submarines? If he was fishing in Lake Nagin, this could of been one of the hundreds of elusive Yellow Submarines.
3
posted on
09/09/2005 7:45:30 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Today is a gift, that's why it is called the present)
To: Hoodlum91
"Give me one ping and one ping only!"
To: SmithL
Sounds to me like he caught the big one! And then it got away.
5
posted on
09/09/2005 7:46:07 AM PDT
by
burzum
(Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
To: SmithL
I am glad to read he was being fairly reasonable about the event. I expect he should be compensated, and they should do right by him because he is not making a huge deal out of it and trying to get rich threatening lawsuits, etc...
Sometimes an accident is just an accident. I hope they don't give him the runaround because he sounds like a reasonable guy.
6
posted on
09/09/2005 7:47:30 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: SmithL
Maybe it was a Russian Sub.............
7
posted on
09/09/2005 7:49:35 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(United States Marine Corps.....An army of WON!...........)
To: SmithL
There have been instances of tug boats mysteriously & rapidly sinking that were towing barges. One of the theories behind these so-called "trippings" was that the tow cable got snagged by a sub. These sinkings were so fast in some instances they weren't able to get a distress call off.
8
posted on
09/09/2005 7:50:46 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: Doohickey; judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; Bottom_Gun; Dog Gone; ..
Submarine? What Submarine?
9
posted on
09/09/2005 7:51:35 AM PDT
by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: SmithL
This poor fisherman lost several thousand dollars of income but still has to pay his crew and other operating expenses. Govt employees simply can't relate to this type of fiscal vulnerability and see no need for compensation. It's the curse of the sole proprietor - the yeoman who is on his own and supports himself through his own efforts.
Too bad the Navy can't be bothered to do the right thing. What a bunch of boobs.
10
posted on
09/09/2005 7:53:06 AM PDT
by
i.l.e.
(Tagline - this space for sale....)
To: SmithL
Just another example of a graduate of Canoe U wrecking his career and future prospects for pushing papers in a quiet corner of the Pentagon until he receives his pension.
Seriously, this is a skipper in deep doo-doo.
Then again, I've seen an aircraft carrier run aground on sand bars (USS Enterprise c. 1986 in Tokyo Bay, where I was an AO3 at the time), and that was above water with harbor pilots guiding the ship, so I can sympathize.
11
posted on
09/09/2005 7:53:57 AM PDT
by
Wombat101
(Sanitized for YOUR protection...)
To: Tallguy
May not have been a submarine according to Coast to Coast Am listeners....
12
posted on
09/09/2005 7:54:26 AM PDT
by
i.l.e.
(Tagline - this space for sale....)
To: SmithL
Maybe a better idea would have been to relocate where there were no subs. Duh.
13
posted on
09/09/2005 8:00:44 AM PDT
by
al_c
To: i.l.e.
Why do you think the Navy isn't doing the right thing? It isn't inconceivable that people could make up stories. The Navy has an obligation to the American people to investigate the situation before they start handing out cash prizes to everyone who claims that a US submarine broke their fishing nets. The Navy also has an obligation to the American people to ensure that the crews are trained not to come in contact with these boats. The Navy will investigate. They take these incidents very seriously (especially with submarines).
--a former submariner
14
posted on
09/09/2005 8:02:47 AM PDT
by
burzum
(Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
To: SmithL
It's Bush's fault. Or will be made to appear that way......
15
posted on
09/09/2005 8:03:27 AM PDT
by
StrangerInParadise
(This tagline has been reported stolen. If you see it, call BR-549..........)
To: SmithL
Cool. If he had brought it to the surface, would he get to keep it?
16
posted on
09/09/2005 8:06:33 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: SmithL
"Chaplaski said that within an hour or so of the incident, one of the submarines radioed him and asked what his intentions were in the area. He said he responded that he was about to make some tows with his net, and the submarine gave him the OK. He said the submarine was at the surface at the time and that when he scanned the horizon he saw the periscope of another submarine off to the other side of his boat. "
There's the critical portion of this story. The subs knew he was fishing in the area and OKed that activity. They were aware, and snagged his net anyhow.
The Navy should pay, and probably will. If it was unsafe for the boat to continue fishing, the sub officer should have told him to stand to and fish elsewhere.
This claim will be paid.
To: SmithL
Wonder how it felt aboard the sub?
I agree with the poster who speculated it could have been a Russian, if they still can afford to have their subs so far from home.
18
posted on
09/09/2005 8:09:24 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(absolute reality)
To: SmithL
Amazing that he could hear our subs talking to one another on the radio, the Russians tried for years and were unsuccessful. Guy is a super spy genius.
To: MineralMan
Cannot prove it was a sub, maybe it was a whale.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson