To: CarolinaGuitarman
That would make it the one exception. Then it wouldn't be a law. If everything tends to go to a state of disorder, what is the force behind it coming together. Even if scientists recreate the conditions that they believe existed at that time, and I don't believe there is any way to verify what they were, then it's still life creating life.
71 posted on
09/08/2005 7:51:27 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
That would make it the one exception.
No, the point is that, despite dishonest creationist claims, the second law of thermodynamics is not a problem for the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution proposes no contradictions to the second law of thermodynamics.
If everything tends to go to a state of disorder, what is the force behind it coming together.
This is not the second law of thermodynamics.
73 posted on
09/08/2005 7:58:15 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: metmom
Gee, is a "closed system" like a "closed mind" in the fantasy world you live in?
75 posted on
09/08/2005 8:02:26 PM PDT by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: metmom
"If everything tends to go to a state of disorder,"
It doesn't. :)
I was talking about the REAL 2nd law, not the creationist rewrite. What about the real 2nd law is in conflict with evolution?
103 posted on
09/09/2005 5:08:04 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson