[Agamemnon]

Your questions were "do you agree?" How can I agree if you won't explain that to which I am agreeing?

That you find you can not answer affiratively to any one of the questions posed reveals that the concepts upon which the simple questions themselves are based may simply be beyond your ability to understand at this time.

Furthermore, since you seem to need more explanation you are simply admitting that you need to better acquaint yourself with thermodynamics.

For starters consult the link on SkyPilot's post #81, and get back to me when you are ready to answer my very simple questions.

[Dimensio]

That you find you can not answer affiratively to any one of the questions posed reveals that the concepts upon which the simple questions themselves are based may simply be beyond your ability to understand at this time.

Or it might mean that it looked like you were making a faulty assumption about evolution but I wanted to be sure that it was really an error in your understanding rather than an error in my interpretation or a poorly-phrased statement from you so I requested clarification before wading right in.

For starters consult the link on SkyPilot's post #81, and get back to me when you are ready to answer my very simple questions.

SkyPilot merely referred to a link explaining thermodynamics. My question was specifically about how you were presenting evolution, not about thermodynamics. Thermodynamics does not, in any way, address evolution, so his link could not possibly contain an answer to my question (and, upon inspection, it is clear that it in fact does not).