Posted on 09/08/2005 5:04:33 PM PDT by RWR8189
Rasmussen, one of 2004's best pollsters has Bush's JA steady at around 46-48%, where its been most of the year thanks to high gas prices.
I think its amusing that nearly a year the election, even in Zogby's little hypothetical poll Bush still defies the much vaunted John Zogby's prediction and beats Kerry.
Its also interesting that Bush and x42 are so close.
I don't understand the Carter numbers, but asking Republicans to choose between Reagan and Bush obviously splits the vote.
Guess he won't have a third term.
</sarcasm<
I have maked e-mail invitations to Zogby polls as spam and moved on.
Oversampled residents of Damascus, Syria.
Key question: "Would you like Bush to be more or less conservative?"
They don't ask that.
Very cute Zogby, especially since Bush can't run again to prove how f'ing wrong an Arab pollster can be.
The only thing missing from his title was the exclamation point.
Looks like we gotta change tactics. I have never seen a President more poll driven. >/sarcasm off
Zogby is as partisan as a stiff erection. He called one Presidential election well and has been trading on it ever since.
In their opinion.
Shouldn't random calls be....random...?
The pollster who predicted a resounding Kerry win over President Bush in 04.
Can't take him seriously anymore.
P.S. to Zogby...It don't matter... Bush ain't running anyway, so what's the point?
And we should believe anything this anti-American jerk has to say about Bush? I suspect Zogby used his brother's CAIR pals as the polling sample.
Figures that for once I was not invited to take part in this Zogby poll!
If I am reading this correctly, Zogby lies again.
He is not pitting President Bush against other presidents, but just comparing lowest poll numbers of each president in each administration. I actually think that Bush is doing remarkably well in the polls considering the MSM lies.
One can be assured that if it were Bush against Carter or even Clinton, the numbers would be drasticly different.
What a stupid question; why would Ronald Reagan be running against GW Bush? But it is interesting to note that it looks like a large percentage of the Demos would vote for Reagan over Bush; THAT'S a first!
No Democrat could beat Bush today in a real election. Not enough Americans trust the Democrats to do the right thing in protecting the nation. They would also abandon the Democratic candidate in droves the minute they realized a Democrat would raise their taxes--and a Democrat would raise them.
I guess only conservatives realize that Bush isn't running again in 2008.
Zogby is still in business? What idiot is still paying him to "poll" for them?
Youngsters polled. They don't know how bad Carter really was....Either that, or Real Estate investors looking to make a killing with double digit inflation. ; )
Will this worthless poll hurt W's 2008 re-election chances?
/sarcasm (except for the worthless poll part)
With the media reporting over the past week the fact that his job approval is not at 0% is amazing!!!
I look forward to the facts being reported................................still waiting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.