Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24; xzins
That's a very, very poor idea. The last thing this country needs is another judge who doesn't understand - or follow - the law.

I trust common people more than I trust Ivy League lawyers. I would prefer to be ruled over by farmers from Idaho than lawyers from Massachusetts and Connecticut.

There is no requirement that a member of the Supreme Court be a lawyer. And being a lawyer is no guarantee that you understand or will follow the law. Indeed, sometimes it is a hindrance. In fact, most times.

Men are not granted wisdom because they went to Yale or Harvard. They have wisdom because it is granted to them by God. In my life I have heard more wisdom from the mouths of gas station attendants and janitors than I have seen expressed in the opinions of most of the justices who have ever sat upon our supreme court.

88 posted on 09/08/2005 9:25:16 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Earl Warren was a governor of California. Look what that got us. Maybe we should call for an Amendment: NO CURRENT OR FORMER POLITICIANS ON THE SC


89 posted on 09/08/2005 10:33:58 PM PDT by PokeyJoe (There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those that don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson