When we start telling each other what their argument was the discussion is pretty much over.
When we start telling each other what their argument was the discussion is pretty much over.
You said the first statement. You are requiring that the TOE say something which is not required by the TOE, unless you endorse or explain the contradiction I elucidated.
If you've "heard it ALL before" then why didn't this argument occur to you? How do you refute it then, not merely run away from it?
Anyway, before insisting others think "outside the box" how about you think outside that wet-paper-bag. It should be easy, you've heard it all.