That is something I have heard many many times before.
Will any evolutionist go on record stating the boundries of the TOE are set in stone never, ever, to be changed?
Will any evolutionist go on record stating there will never, ever, be a new theory with boundries taking in both evolution and origin of life?
I didn't say evolution "depends" on anything. I said, "what's wrong with the premise?" You can draw any conclusions you like.
Will any evolutionist go on record stating the boundries of the TOE are set in stone never, ever, to be changed?
Why is this a relevant question to anything?
Will any evolutionist go on record stating there will never, ever, be a new theory with boundries taking in both evolution and origin of life?
Or this? Science marches on no matter what any individual will say. Reality is what it is, and any theory is just that, a theory. The closer the theory corresponds to reality, the more "fact" it contains but it is a mistake to confuse the two.