I still don't understand, exactly what is *my* impossible premise?
Ok, I guess I'm going to have to draw with crayons. You said while castigating someone else to "think out of the box":
*Why* can't the TOE say something about origin of life??
The typical, invariable Creationist challenge to the idea that the TOE could explain the origin of life is the question:
"Then how does evolution explain how life could arise from a dead universe" or other somesuch objections.
So I challenged you to "think outside the box" by explaining what is wrong with that premise.
Do you get it now?