To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; headsonpikes; grey_whiskers; PatrickHenry
To: snarks_when_bored
3 posted on
09/08/2005 1:35:10 PM PDT by
Borges
To: snarks_when_bored
Hmm, let's see. Science can only 'prove' the repeatable and controllable, otherwise you are dealing in theory. So science cannot be the standard upon which we base truth or ultimate knowledge.
What does that leave?
Faith in the words of a God who chose to reveal Himself to and through, his creation.
Prove me wrong!
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
| EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 300 names.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
26 posted on
09/08/2005 1:50:25 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Discoveries attributable to the scientific method -- 100%; to creation science -- zero.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson