Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout
I find the IDiot's assumption that, if it is the case that all factors are entirely natural, it must also be the case that we humans *must* be clever enough to be able to explain them... TO BE SO OBVIOUSLY AN ASSERTION OF UNSCIENTIFIC VANITY THAT I AM TRULY AMAZED IT IS EVER TREATED KINDLY.

I tend to ask, "Was there a deadline for knowing everything? Did we miss it?"

199 posted on 09/08/2005 5:47:41 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro

there's that, too, but even that kind-sorta assumes we are clever enough to explain everything, when, really, it is entirely possible that the very smartest possible human might fall short of having such mental capacity.


200 posted on 09/08/2005 5:49:20 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson