Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Largess in Louisiana: Money Flowed to Questionable Projects
Washington Post ^ | 9/8/05 | Michael Grunwald

Posted on 09/07/2005 10:00:50 PM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: M. Espinola

After hearing the reports that the state officials stop the Red Cross from start relief at the Superdome, I'm beginning to think some state DEM idiots might have planned to use the press for Bush bashing.


61 posted on 09/08/2005 4:36:29 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
National Dems may have very well informed state cohorts 'let's make Bush look a bad as possible' regarding the hurricane.
62 posted on 09/08/2005 4:47:45 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

The use dead Senators. Why not a hurricane?


63 posted on 09/08/2005 4:50:17 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
You know, from a behavioral science POV, I have noticed that hysterical reactions to situations generally imply personal guilt, there would be no other reason for Landrieu in particular to start hurling wild accusations practically before the winds stopped. Senators Lott, Cochran,Shelby and Sessions did not have the same type of reaction, maybe because their consciences are clear? Just a thought!

Also that the Washington Post would publish this means the Democrats have opened up a can of worms they will come to regret. From the "victims" point of view, the kindness showed to them by their rescuers and the people caring for them now, will cause them to turn on state and local officials. They may be poor, but they are not so stupid to see that the state and local officials failed them.
64 posted on 09/08/2005 5:47:32 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08+Levin for Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

I think the floodwaters of LA are going to wash up more than it's corrupt government bargained for. Been a long time coming.


65 posted on 09/08/2005 6:08:56 AM PDT by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
You know it's like an abused wife, she thinks that is how things are until she escapes and meets a really nice man and finds out you don't HAVE to live like that.

I have likened the people of Iraq to the abused wife syndrome also.

66 posted on 09/08/2005 6:18:38 AM PDT by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming

"Someday a real rain is going to come, and wash all the scum off the streets."


67 posted on 09/08/2005 6:19:59 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

I don't care who ya are, that there is funny!
And true. ;>)


68 posted on 09/08/2005 6:28:47 AM PDT by Straight8 (Humpty Dumpty was pushed!(That's my conspiracy theory, and I'm Stickin' to it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Peace will be here soon
"I can`t wait until the Congressional hearings start."

I hope you are not holding your breath 'til then.

70 posted on 09/08/2005 6:53:09 AM PDT by Designer (Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
"...the Bush administration's funding requests for the key New Orleans flood-control projects for the past five years were slightly higher than the Clinton administration's for its past five years."

BUSH SPENT MORE ON NEW ORLEANS THAN CLINTON!

My conclusion? Clinton doesn't care about black people.

71 posted on 09/08/2005 7:38:28 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear

Clinton spent less because he doesn't care about black people.


72 posted on 09/08/2005 7:39:31 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Peach
"But overall, the Bush administration's funding requests for the key New Orleans flood-control projects for the past five years were slightly higher than the Clinton administration's for its past five years."

There is only one conclusion to draw from Clinton spending less: he must not care about black people.

73 posted on 09/08/2005 7:41:05 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
YOU MISSED THE KEY PARAGRAPH OF THE ARTICLE: BUSH GAVE MORE FUNDS THAN CLINTON FOR N.O. FLOOD CONTROL!!!

But overall, the Bush administration's funding requests for the key New Orleans flood-control projects for the past five years were slightly higher than the Clinton administration's for its past five years. Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, the chief of the Corps, has said that in any event, more money would not have prevented the drowning of the city, since its levees were designed to protect against a Category 3 storm, and the levees that failed were already completed projects. Strock has also said that the marsh-restoration project would not have done much to diminish Katrina's storm surge, which passed east of the coastal wetlands.

74 posted on 09/08/2005 7:41:58 AM PDT by CWW (Mark Sanford for President on 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

And while I don't necessarily believe that's true, it's how the left plays the game. Offense. And we're always on defense.


75 posted on 09/08/2005 7:42:04 AM PDT by Peach (South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CWW

Notice how that information was BURIED in the article...way way way down?? :) Leftist reporters crack me up.


76 posted on 09/08/2005 7:49:37 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: oyez

That there was even such a thing as "the levee board", and that one could gain a much-coveted seat on it, and thereby
be considered to have "arrived" politically, shows just how wayward and corrupt the system (not just) down there has become. It is after all only a model for so much of entrenched bureaucracy---these "boards" are political way-stations for politicians scrambling on the way up. Their mandate *seems* to be to *do something*, but in fact, there is no mandate besides the self-congratulation that comes to and from one political hack to another at having got "a seat on the board": the position therefore is seen as an end in itself, forget about what the actual function and mission of the board was. THIS is what politics has largely become in our country---it's a wonder we survive it. THESE ARE NOT PEOPLE WHO WANT TO SOLVE PROBLEMS---THEY ARE POLITICAL HACKS.


77 posted on 09/08/2005 7:54:00 AM PDT by willyboyishere (AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oyez

That there was even such a thing as "the levee board", and that one could gain a much-coveted seat on it, and thereby
be considered to have "arrived" politically, shows just how wayward and corrupt the system (not just) down there has become. It is after all only a model for so much of entrenched bureaucracy---these "boards" are political way-stations for politicians scrambling on the way up. Their mandate *seems* to be to *do something*, but in fact, there is no mandate besides the self-congratulation that comes to and from one political hack to another at having got "a seat on the board": the position therefore is seen as an end in itself, forget about what the actual function and mission of the board was. THIS is what politics has largely become in our country---it's a wonder we survive it. THESE ARE NOT PEOPLE WHO WANT TO SOLVE PROBLEMS---THEY ARE POLITICAL HACKS.


78 posted on 09/08/2005 7:54:04 AM PDT by willyboyishere (AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Yeah -- Real Shocker!! Wash. Post buries paragraph showing Bush Spent More Than Clinton on La. Flood Projects.

Hmmm -- Go Figure.

79 posted on 09/08/2005 8:00:11 AM PDT by CWW (Mark Sanford for President on 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
If I were a Republican I'd be pushing this story with everything I had. But, of course, it's dangerous for everyone. All politicians have an affinity for pork and mud.

But pork and mud (and lots of water) got us into this mess - perhaps it's time for all politicians to do some self-reflecting. Especially those directly involved in this situation.

80 posted on 09/08/2005 8:00:43 AM PDT by meyer (Eastern Tennessee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson