Posted on 09/07/2005 7:33:54 AM PDT by Simmy2.5
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Gay rights supporters cheered loudly from the gallery as California lawmakers became the first in the country to approve a bill allowing same-sex marriages. But their celebration may be short-lived. ADVERTISEMENT
The legislation could be vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has expressed an acceptance of gay marriages but said it's an issue that should be decided by voters or the courts.
"He will uphold whatever the court decides," spokeswoman Margita Thompson said Tuesday after the state Assembly approved the same-sex marriage measure, 41-35. The Senate had approved it last week.
A state appellate court is considering appeals of a lower court ruling that overturned California laws banning recognition of gay marriages. And opponents of same-sex marriage are trying to qualify initiatives for the 2006 ballot that would amend the state Constitution to ban gay marriages.
The bill's supporters compared the legislation to earlier civil rights campaigns, including efforts to eradicate slavery and give women the right to vote.
"Do what we know is in our hearts," said the bill's sponsor, San Francisco Democrat Mark Leno. "Make sure all California families will have the same protection under the law."
But opponents repeatedly cited the public's vote five years ago to approve Proposition 22, which prohibits California from recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries.
"History will record that you betrayed your constituents and their moral and ethical values," Republican Assemblyman Jay La Suer said.
Leno had sponsored an earlier bill that fell four votes short of passing the Assembly in June. He kept the issue alive by adding the language of the defeated measure to another bill that had already passed the Assembly and was awaiting action in the Senate.
The Senate approved that bill and sent it back to the Assembly for another vote. Four Democrats who didn't vote the last time tipped the scales.
One of them, Assemblyman Tom Umberg, said Tuesday he was concerned about what his three children would think of him if he didn't join those "who sought to take a leadership role in terms of tolerance, equality and fairness."
California already gives same-sex couples many of the rights and duties of marriage if they register with the state as domestic partners.
Massachusetts' highest court ruled in November 2003 that the state constitution guarantees same-sex couples the right to marry. The nation's first state-sanctioned, same-sex weddings began taking place in May 2004.
Vermont began offering civil unions in 2000, after a ruling by the state's Supreme Court. Earlier this year, Connecticut became the first state to approve civil unions without being forced by the courts.
Tuesday's vote showed that gay rights advocates have "turned the corner on the issue of marriage equality for lesbian and gay couples," said Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, a backer of the bill.
"As the debate today shows, love conquers fear, principle conquers politics and equality conquers injustice, and the governor can now secure his legacy as a true leader by signing this bill," he said.
But Randy Thomasson, president of the Campaign for Children and Families, a conservative group opposed to the bill, said Schwarzenegger should veto it.
"Schwarzenegger can't afford to sign the gay marriage license bill," he said. "He'll actually become a hero to the majority of Californians when he vetoes it."
Am I the only one that sees a problem with this logic?
Yay!
I don't care what his reasoning is, just veto it Arnold.
He better damn well veto this. Nobody at least the majority of us here in California want this.
Logic has no place in politics.
Cross your fingers
I saw the problem with his logic immediately.
The issue really does belong to the legislature, but a referendum should be capable of reversing legislation when it is clearly out of step with the majority.
The courts should have no say except to uphold what the voters say is the law.
You cannot have it both ways Arnie! You need to protect and uphold the WILL OF THE VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA -- that is your job. VETO THIS PIECE OF PERVERTED TRASH...
The media speaks of Arnolds or Bush's approval ratings.
They are still higher then the state/fed congresses.
80% of Californian's say NO to gay marriage yet here we are.
I got a call from a republican fund raiser last night - it did not go well for their end.
Arnold vetos this and the driver license bill upon first entering office becuase we elected him to do so. This has not changed.
I tend to agree. This an issue for the legislature to decide, or for the people in a referendum.
The courts?
Well, I guess he figures the courts should choose between the people via prop 22 and the people via their representatives. What a joke. Anyway, it is hardly worth fighting for since California already has gay marriage by the name domestic partner.
Why is it that politicians (especially in California) insist they know what is best for the state and then repeatedly, And I do mean repeatedly, go directly against the wishes of constituents?
Examples: California voters voted down outdated affirmative action laws. Californian's voted down gay marriage. Californian's voted down increases in taxes for state schools (1997 - this followed $900 Mil spent to save a redwood forest from a 3rd generation family of loggers).
Even more frustrating is that the ignorant citizens of California continue to vote for these people. When asked to vote for something they vote conservative. When asked to vote for a government rep., they either do not show up or are programmed to vote democrat and then consistently hate the people they vote for.
Arlnold is the Gov. of California because Davis was a snoozing, conspiring, activist, crook that finally got some press when the lights kept going out and companies kept moving away.
...I'm done ranting for now....
The judges will strike down the law no matter what Arnold does. The Constitution clearly says that no law may violate an accepted proposition.
He'll veto it. Bet on it.
The only thing keeping CA from falling into the abyss is a RINO actor trying to straddle the moral-leadership fence from deciding what's right and wrong.
"The only thing keeping CA from falling into the abyss is a RINO actor trying to straddle the moral-leadership fence from deciding what's right and wrong."
Huh?
Very interesting, considering that Arnold was the best man in the 1989 gay "wedding" of fellow bodybuilder Bob Paris.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.