To: HAL9000
""We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media," the spokeswoman said in an e-mailed response to a Reuters inquiry. "Before reading this post, I have been sensing a conspiratorial effort on the part of all gov't officials and media to withhold actual causuality count figures. I think the public is being lied to. To what end, I assume it is to not further depress the evacuees?
22 posted on
09/06/2005 10:41:12 PM PDT by
de Buillion
(Perspective: 1880 dead Heroes in 3 yr vs. 3589 abortions EVERY DAY , 1999, USA.)
To: de Buillion
I think the public is being lied to. To what end, I assume it is to not further depress the evacuees?
This is not something that can be hidden in this day and age. Too many computers.
27 posted on
09/06/2005 10:46:20 PM PDT by
konaice
To: de Buillion
I assume it is to not further depress the evacuees? You mean unless they see an actual picture, they may not miss their loved one?
38 posted on
09/06/2005 11:04:39 PM PDT by
Howlin
(Have you check in on this thread: FYI: Hurricane Katrina Freeper SIGN IN Thread)
To: de Buillion
". . .I have been sensing a conspiratorial effort on the part of all gov't officials and media to withhold actual causuality count figures. I think the public is being lied to. "
Been saying this since the beginning. This article just strengthens that hunch.
Like you, I ask: How come?
93 posted on
09/07/2005 10:35:04 AM PDT by
doberville
(Angels can fly when they take themselves lightly)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson