[U.H. Conservative]

Did I say that I did not know what FEMA was not supposed to do? My initial criticism was never about FEMA's actions or inactions. It was about the fact that he was utterly uninformed of a situation that was all over the news. That is inexcusable.

And how does FEMA define "164 emergency responses?" As an attorney, I could say that I have helped "hundreds of people" because I've done intake interviews, been able to give some advice and send them on their way. So the statement would technically be true, even though it would not in any way square with what the average individual thinks it means.

[Eagle Eye]

You must be a shoddy attorney if you don't know how they define an "Emergency Response" since that is a technical term that opens the door for grants, loans and other aid.


C'mon, do some research and quit showing us how ignorant and inept you are.

Your idea of what is 'inexcusable' is totally invalid in light of your inexcusable ignorance.