Posted on 09/06/2005 9:19:33 AM PDT by REactor
I am no authoritarian and will not alter constitution to seek re-election, Russia’s President declares
RUSSIA will not tolerate outside interference in former Soviet republics or any attempts to destabilise countries on Russia’s borders, President Putin declared last night.
Still angry at the Orange Revolution that toppled Ukraine’s pro-Russian leader in December, Mr Putin denounced non-governmental organisations that were quietly backed by Western governments and fomented uprisings in Moscow’s former sphere of influence.
“Our foreign partners may be making a mistake,” he said during a 2½-hour meeting in the Kremlin with Western academics and journalists, including The Times. “We are not against any changes in the former Soviet Union. We are afraid only that those changes will be chaotic. Otherwise there will be banana republics where he who shouts loudest wins.”
Mr Putin poured scorn on the new Ukrainian Government of President Yushchenko, saying that it was riven by corruption and had caused the collapse of an agreement for a new Russian gas pipeline to Western Europe. He had warned Europe of those consequences, he said, but “no one wanted to listen to us — and we have to be listened to”.
Mr Putin’s confident performance was clearly intended to soften his image in the West, where he is seen as increasingly authoritarian, and to rebut rumours that he was planning to stay on in office when his term expires in 2008.
“No, I am not going to run for president in 2008. No, we are not going to amend the constitution,” he insisted.
He also denied that he was an authoritarian, but said that all states should work out their democratic systems according to their culture and society: “We simply cannot copy everything. That would be counter-productive.”
To the charge that he was trying to introduce some kind of “managed democracy” he replied: “I don’t know what this is. Democracy either exists or it doesn’t exist. It cannot be set apart from the rule of law.”
Mr Putin expressed his shock at the devastation in New Orleans. “It is simply awful. I look at it and can’t believe my eyes. It tells us that, however strong and powerful we believe ourselves, we are nothing in front of nature and God almighty.”
He said he had ordered helicopters and planeloads of emergency aid to be made ready if the US asked for them. He had not personally spoken to “George”, but his officials were in daily contact with their US counterparts.
But on the highly contentious issue of Iran he was less emollient. He expressedconcern over Tehran’s nuclear programmes, but insisted that it had done nothing illegal to date, and should not yet be referred to the UN Security Council. Everybody had to move cautiously and sensibly, on this issue and North Korea. That would be “a great achievement of international diplomacy”.
Mr Putin was predictably uncompromising over Chechnya. Speaking only two days after receiving a delegation of bereaved mothers from Beslan, he said Shamil Basayev, who masterminded the school’s seizure, had to be caught or eliminated as soon as possible. He condemned Western news outlets that, hiding behind “some demagogic rhetoric” about freedom of expression, had given him and other terrorists the platform of publicity.
Mr Putin said Russia’s relations with China were now better than they had been for at least 40 years. He tried to allay worries that the recent joint military manoeuvres were intended as a warning and said that this new closeness represented no threat to Japan or Korea.
But he referred sarcastically to Japan’s attempts to resolve the dispute over the Kurile Islands, arguing that Russia was ready to do a deal in 1956.
Mr Putin was equally scathing about attempts by Estonia and Latvia to reopen a border dispute with Russia. He said that he had been willing to sign a deal with Estonia — even though it had refused to attend the 60th anniversary celebrations of VE Day in Moscow in May — because he believed it was time to turn a new page.
But Estonia’s Parliament had tried to insert language from a 1920 treaty that Russia found “absolutely unacceptable”, and which would set a precedent for reopening any number of territorial rows in Europe. What would it mean for the border between Poland and Germany, he asked? Mr Putin said Russia’s economic outlook was extremely bright, largely because of high oil prices. But he insisted that the country would not spend the windfall earnings irresponsibly, or fuel inflation. He wanted to invest the money in a stability fund, encouraging high technology, boosting health, housing and science, and repaying Russia’s loans.
But he accepted that corruption throughout Russia was still a big problem, as it was in all countries in transition. He laughed when asked about corruption within the Kremlin itself, insisting that officials who sat on the boards of state companies were there simply to guard state interests.
Mr Putin, a committed Christian, said that religion had a big place to play in Russia, and the Government, without dictating to churches or mosques, would do everything to restore property to them and help them to expand. Russia had built dozens of new mosques and synagogues recently, including the largest synagogue in Europe. He said it was also considering a proper commemoration of the Holocaust, including perhaps even the building of a Holocaust museum.
Mr Putin, a committed Christian,
ROTLMAO When and where did this sudden conversion take place, comrade Putin?! Uhahahaha!
BTW a few days ago a Polish diplomat was arrested on Polish-Belorussian border for smuggling "illegal" press, i.e. periodicals of the Association of Poles in Ukraine. He was accused of western espionage.
ping
ping
"By destabilising border countries he means any attempt to bring democracy there??"
I was waiting for the other shoe to drop when he bragged how he had planes standing by to go to NO.
Leave it to the Kremlin to attack when we are in the midst of a disaster.
It does remain to be seen whether the 'colored revolutions' (It's a shame Apple Computer didn't trademark that one) will in fact be a positive event.
Yushenko seems to be doing a lot of anti-Russian things but isn't exactly succeeding in creating a massive sustainable western aligned economy.
Most of Europe's big players that rallied behind Yushenko want nothing to do with him on important issues like Ukraine potentially joining the EU.
That said Putin can whine all he wants Belarus's days as a communist dictatorship are numbered.
ROTLFMAO; oh Christ help me!! So there are really some pitiful patsies who actually believe this crap??? oh please please, not anymore!! Bwahahahahhhhaaa...
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH
What the hell is this :) ?
Those revolutions were "positive" only if they brought to power people who were elected by the majority. You, as an American should understand that this is something good.
Most of Europe's big players that rallied behind Yushenko want nothing to do with him on important issues like Ukraine potentially joining the EU.
I don't want to be chauvinistic, but the only (semi)big player that rallied for Yushchenko was Poland. EU and US joined later.
France, Germany and Britain didn't want Ukraine inside EU before the orange revolution, and they don't want it now. The reason is that Ukraine is still unreformed economically, and because France and Germany don't want to "annoy" Putin.
Thanks, but it's nothing new. Corruption flourishes all over Europe (E.Europe especially)
Sorry, I don't understand. Please elaborate on this a bit more. What hardships, what elections, etcetera.
"“No, I am not going to run for president in 2008. No, we are not going to amend the constitution,” he insisted"
His successor will be selected by the current collective leadership (mainly former FSB employees) and "approved" by a bogus election.
In Putin's favor I suppose, is the fact that no journalist in Russia seems to find fault with him. On the other hand, the fact that all recent journalistic opponents have been killed could be a disincentive in that regard.
On the positive side, none were executed by the government. All were apparently executed Mafia-style---with no apparent government investigation, no suspects, and no arrests. It is my understanding that due to job cutbacks in the FSB (former KGB), many former FSB employees are now in the Mafia
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.