Skip to comments.
John Roberts' Critics Outraged All Over Again
cnsnews.com ^
| September 06, 2005
| By Susan Jones
Posted on 09/06/2005 8:35:47 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: InvisibleChurch
"Now that Roberts' attitudes toward women have been revealed . . ."
Like homeless persons (AKA street bums) NOW only makes an appearance during Republican administrations, having mysteriously absented itself throughout the `90s.
(While on the subject of democrahypocrisy, `Hey Ted: how do you feel about renewable energy? Just not in your neighborhood?')
21
posted on
09/06/2005 9:09:28 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
("I feel the same way, and that's the way it is. (Have pity on an old man)" Walter Cronkite)
To: InvisibleChurch
Has anyone see the ad running in support of Roberts? There's about a 15 second clip of "Plugs" Biden at the start of the hearings for Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
He advises her, in so many words, that it should be her decision as to which questions she answers, and she should be able to tell the members of the Senate which questions she deems "off limits", if they appear to be questions of law which she may have to rule on in future cases before the court.
Senator Specter in his opening comments should read Biden's instructions to Roberts WORD FOR WORD at the start of their hearings, changing only Ginsberg's name to Roberts, when appropriate.
Let the 'Rats choke on their own words, and grin and bear it!
To: InvisibleChurch
"If Roberts is confirmed as chief justice, Bush will have established right-wing leadership of the Court for another 30 years -- a lifetime legacy of the Bush presidency Please let it be so...puts a smile on my face just thinking about it.
To: InvisibleChurch
Great news! If the moonbats are 'outrages' it must be good for the country.
I am waiting for the interviews with Sean Penn and Cindy Sheehan so we can get their opinion ... LOL.
24
posted on
09/06/2005 9:12:58 AM PDT
by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: InvisibleChurch
Righteous indignation is usually neither.
25
posted on
09/06/2005 9:14:38 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Join the AmishDude fan club: "Great point." -- AliVertias; ":-) Very clever" -- MJY1288)
To: InvisibleChurch
Contrived outrage. Ho hum.
To: Fido969
Listening to and watching Kim Gandy,I get the impression that her dildo has splinters.
To: InvisibleChurch
The usual gang of idiots ...
To: grellis; Southflanknorthpawsis; Deb; RnMomof7
Here's where, if I were a woman, I think I'd be writing letters to the editor, saying things like, "I resent Ms. Grandy ignoring the polls and tarring all women as if their highest values in life were the right to ruin themselves with immorality, and to butcher the children who follow. Perhaps these represent her core values, but they do not represent ours."
Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG
29
posted on
09/06/2005 9:22:55 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
30
posted on
09/06/2005 9:24:04 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: InvisibleChurch
While I would prefer Antonin Scalia as CJ, Roberts may be the best choice politically given his relatively young age and the fact he's already gone through the grinder once unscathed. Plus, it provides an opportunity for Bush to push an even more conservative Justice through. Think Edith Brown Clement or Janice Rogers Brown
Can you think of the fun we could have if Democrats opposed this woman
![](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/07/05/PH2005070500582.jpg)
Click on for USSC short-list
31
posted on
09/06/2005 9:24:14 AM PDT
by
Smedley
To: b4its2late
Talk about nuts...the DUers want either Clintoon or Skerry named to the SCOTUS!
32
posted on
09/06/2005 9:28:29 AM PDT
by
samanella
((Proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy-all my bumper stickers say so))
To: dearolddad
One could look at her picture and say : "Oh come on, that's a GUY!"
I think she looks a bit like Tom Hanks;)
To: InvisibleChurch
From my blog post today:
*************
Hear me, Lefties? The mere fact that he was a business man and faced down scarier posers than you guys makes President Bush SMARTER, FASTER, more ADEPT, and more PATIENT than you!
Think the hand of fate dealt you a Katrina Royal Flush (pun intended)?
Cue Kenny Rogers - "Know When to Hold 'Em"
Yep, I figured that would send you cockroaches scuttling for your hidey-holes. Fortunately for you, I only bring out Kenny Rogers for "special occasions."
[Addendum] - Hey Kim Gandy - put some ice on it. We DON'T feel your pain.
All those aborted babies, on the other hand...hey, weren't a majority of those BLACK babies??????
Hmmmmmmm.
34
posted on
09/06/2005 9:50:27 AM PDT
by
Alkhin
(http://awanderingconfluence.com/blog)
To: InvisibleChurch
Groups that oppose the nomination of Judge John Roberts to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the U.S. Supreme Court are even more furious now that President Bush has nominated Roberts to serve as chief justice.GOOD!!!
35
posted on
09/06/2005 10:08:05 AM PDT
by
shekkian
To: BibChr
Now that Roberts' attitudes toward women have been revealed..."
Have they? I keep missing the memos.
a lifetime legacy of the Bush presidency that women and girls will have a lifetime to regret," Gandy said.
Should perhaps read:
Abortion: a legacy of the feminIST movement that women and girls will have a lifetime to regret.
I tried to read the rest of it but I've had my fill of seething stupidity and hatred for today.
36
posted on
09/06/2005 10:19:39 AM PDT
by
grellis
(Femininist. Think about it.)
To: InvisibleChurch
"We look forward to consulting with him on the makeup of the Supreme Court."
Leahy has an interesting sense of humor.
37
posted on
09/06/2005 10:32:35 AM PDT
by
Moral Hazard
("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
To: InvisibleChurch
Kennedy said...... it is difficult at this time for the American people to participate fully in the selection of the next chief justice..... does this jackass propose or think I get to vote on SC judges? What a besotted fool.
38
posted on
09/06/2005 10:54:10 AM PDT
by
Safetgiver
(Only two requisites to be a judge. Gray hair to look wise and hemorrhoids to look concerned.)
To: dearolddad
Listening to and watching Kim Gandy,I get the impression that her dildo has splinters. Ow.
39
posted on
09/06/2005 1:15:23 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
To: InvisibleChurch
Teddie teddie teddie the senior senator from Massachusetts sadly does not nominate justices for the Supreme Court.
40
posted on
09/06/2005 8:30:21 PM PDT
by
zendari
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson