Please try another few years away. This is loony, the mirror image of the DU loons who think Rove is an evil genius.
SD
You insult me greatly, sir, far more than you know, to compare me with those heathens.
It would be loony to suggest that the libs would intentionally and arbitrarily destroy a city just to get Bush. But this isn't what happened here. What happened here is that they realized one of their cities was in the cross-hairs of a Cat 5 hurricane, and that no matter what, the event was going to be disastrous. So they were faced with two choices:
1) Do everything possible before and after the storm hit to make the event less disastrous;
2) Do nothing at all before and after the storm so that the event would be as disastrous as possible, in order to have more things to blame Bush with when they blamed him.
They chose the latter course, for obvious reasons.
If you can't see the difference between deliberately destroying a city -- by setting off bombs, for example -- and not reacting at all to an unavoidable natural disaster in order to create the opportunity to slander and falsely accuse the President, then I can't help you.