Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

It's easy to sit back and say "Bush should have done more" or "the Feds should have moved faster" after the fact.

However, take a look at what Bush's record over the past five years and tell me that he isn't proactive or motivated to help people in a time of crisis.

Knee-jerk reactions aren't needed here. Take a look at all the factors that caused this and see that NO was a disaster waiting to happen and when the disaster hit, the state and local leaders did nothing to help their citizens. And to take this a step further, it's up to the people of LA and NO to take a little bit of PERSONAL responsibility for their own lives and the lives of their children.

If you live in a city that is built BELOW sea level, and there's a hurricane coming, and you don't have a car, and you can't get a ride out of town, and you can't get to a shelter, and you have half a brain.... go to the store, buy $20 worth of bottled water, some peanut butter, crackers, batteries, and whatever else you may need to make it through a few days without electricity or water.

Damn, I live in PA, at the top of a hill, nowhere near a flood zone but when there's a bad rainstorm or snowstorm coming, I make sure we have enough supplies in the house so that we don't starve if we can't get to the store.

Common-friggin'-sense. If you ignore the threat, you aren't a victim, you're an idiot.


193 posted on 09/06/2005 9:51:09 AM PDT by gruffwolf (Katrina - didn't blow as hard as the liberal left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: gruffwolf
It's easy to sit back and say "Bush should have done more" or "the Feds should have moved faster" after the fact.

It is more difficult to make those comments before the event happened. I did say the Sunday morning that Nagin declared a mandatory evacutation, that we should have sent in military aircraft to evacuate people.

However, take a look at what Bush's record over the past five years and tell me that he isn't proactive or motivated to help people in a time of crisis.

Never said that. We are talking about this crisis. I don't doubt his motivation to help people. He understood the nature of the threat by declaring the whole Gulf Coast a disaster area before the storm hit to facilitate assistance.

If you live in a city that is built BELOW sea level, and there's a hurricane coming, and you don't have a car, and you can't get a ride out of town, and you can't get to a shelter, and you have half a brain.... go to the store, buy $20 worth of bottled water, some peanut butter, crackers, batteries, and whatever else you may need to make it through a few days without electricity or water.

Sure people should be personally responsible. Kids, the infirm, aged, and sick should not be held to that standard. There was also a mindset that this was just another example of the government crying wolf. The last time NO had been hit by a major hurricane was 1969 with Camille. Whatever they did or did not do, they deserve assistance.

Damn, I live in PA, at the top of a hill, nowhere near a flood zone but when there's a bad rainstorm or snowstorm coming, I make sure we have enough supplies in the house so that we don't starve if we can't get to the store. Common-friggin'-sense. If you ignore the threat, you aren't a victim, you're an idiot.

Does that same rationale apply to folks who build there homes on fault lines, e.g., San Andrreas fault?

197 posted on 09/06/2005 10:02:31 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson